Opening Reality Check
“The government that governs least, governs best” vs. “We
need government to solve our problems”
American paradox: We simultaneously want:
- Smaller, more efficient government
- More services and better performance
- Lower taxes and higher quality
- Less bureaucracy and more accountability
Today’s focus: How reform movements try to resolve
these contradictions
It’s Not Just Academic
Theory
Reform movements shape your future workplace:
- How school districts organize and operate
- What technologies permitting agencies use to manage
applications
- How public-works departments approach service delivery
- How agencies measure and report performance
Current examples: Performance budgeting,
customer-service standards, digital transformation, cross-agency
collaboration
Your role: You’ll be both implementing existing
reforms and designing new ones
Revolutionary Origins: Born from dissatisfaction
with existing government Federalism: 50 states as
“laboratories of democracy” Democratic Values:
Regular elections create pressure for change Business
Culture: “If it works in private sector, why not government?”
Crisis-Driven: Major problems trigger reform
movements
Result: Continuous cycle of reform,
counter-reform, and new reform
The Cycle Repeats
Progressive Era (1900s-1920s):
- Professional civil service, merit hiring
- Scientific management principles
New Deal (1930s-1940s):
- Expanded federal role, new agencies
- Administrative coordination and planning
Great Society (1960s):
- Social programs, community participation
- Representative bureaucracy
Reinventing Government (1980s-2000s):
- Market-based reforms, privatization
- Performance measurement, customer service
Different
Approaches to “Fixing” Government
1. Downsizing: Make government smaller and cheaper
2. Reinventing/Reengineering: Make government work
like business 3. Continuous Improvement: Make
government work better
Key insight: These often conflict with each
other
- Downsizing vs. better service
- Business efficiency vs. democratic accountability
- Continuous improvement vs. revolutionary change
“Government is Too
Big and Costs Too Much”
Core Philosophy:
- Private sector more efficient than public
- Government crowds out private initiative
- Taxpayers are customers being overcharged
- Smaller government = better government
Famous Examples:
- Proposition 13 (California, 1978): Property tax
limits
- Taxpayer Bill of Rights (Colorado): Revenue
limits
- Reagan Era (1980s): Federal workforce
reduction
Downsizing in Public
Services
Real-World Applications
Public Works and Utilities:
- Privatizing some utility and sanitation functions
- Contract employees for seasonal and specialized work
- Shared services across neighboring jurisdictions
- Consolidating small departments (parks, streets,
sanitation)
Permitting and Benefits Agencies:
- Online applications to reduce front-counter staff
- Automated eligibility and renewal for benefits
- Shared services across jurisdictions
- Self-service portals for routine transactions
Social Services:
- Contracted case management for specific populations
- Electronic benefits delivery vs. paper checks
- Community-based service alternatives
- Tiered eligibility screening to focus intensive services
Downsizing: Benefits and
Problems
What Works and What Doesn’t
Potential Benefits:
- Lower costs and taxes
- Reduced bureaucracy and red tape
- More flexible operations
- Competition-driven efficiency
Common Problems:
- Service quality may decline
- Democratic accountability weakened
- Job losses and morale problems
- False savings (costs shift elsewhere)
Example: Privatized municipal solid-waste
collection in some cities has cut costs but also produced
service-equity complaints and accountability problems
“Government Should Work
Like Business”
Osborne & Gaebler’s Principles (1992):
- Government should steer, not row
- Empower communities and families
- Inject competition into service delivery
- Be driven by mission, not rules
- Focus on results, not inputs
- Meet customer needs, not bureaucracy
- Earn rather than spend
- Prevent rather than cure
- Decentralize authority
- Solve problems through market mechanisms
Reinventing Government:
Clinton Era
Goals:
- Cut 252,000 federal jobs
- Save $108 billion over 5 years
- Reduce red tape and regulations
- Improve customer service
Methods:
- Employee empowerment initiatives
- One-stop service centers
- Performance measurement systems
- Customer satisfaction surveys
Results: Mixed success - some savings and
improvements, but also unintended consequences
Reinventing in Public
Services
Schools:
- School choice and charters: Service-provider
competition
- Performance dashboards: Data-driven school
management
- Customer service: Parent satisfaction
surveys
- Decentralization: Site-based management in
individual schools
Permitting and Inspection:
- Process redesign: Business process
improvement
- Performance metrics: Time to permit, days
to inspection
- Customer focus: User-friendly procedures and
online services
- Technology: Electronic filing, online
payments, mobile inspections
Social Services:
- Performance contracts: Outcomes-based
payments to nonprofits
- Employment outcomes: Results-oriented
workforce programs
- Cost-effectiveness: Per-participant cost
comparisons
“Blow Up the Old System
and Start Over”
Core Concept: Fundamental redesign of work
processes
- Don’t automate existing processes - redesign them
- Focus on outcomes, not activities
- Eliminate non-value-added steps
- Use technology to enable new ways of working
Famous Example: Passport processing - from 6 weeks
to 10 days by completely redesigning the process
Reengineering in Practice
Public Service Examples
Permit Processing:
- Before: Paper files, multiple manual handoffs,
sequential processing
- After: Electronic records, parallel processing,
automated workflow
Tax Administration:
- Before: Paper returns, manual data entry,
limited search capability
- After: Digital returns, integrated databases,
instant refund processing
Benefits Intake:
- Before: Multiple office visits, paper forms,
manual verification
- After: Single application, electronic records,
automated eligibility checks
CJ students: court CMS systems, e-citations, and corrections
intake are the same kind of reengineering — the trade-offs and
resistance patterns are identical.
Challenge: Reengineering often meets resistance
from employees used to old ways
“Small Changes Add Up to
Big Results”
Philosophy:
- Employees closest to work know how to improve it
- Small, incremental changes are sustainable
- Quality improvement never ends
- Focus on processes, not just outcomes
Tools:
- Total Quality Management (TQM)
- Six Sigma methodology
- Plan-Do-Check-Act cycles
- Employee suggestion programs
Continuous Improvement
Examples
Public Service
Applications
Schools:
- Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles: Teachers iterating on
lesson design
- After-action reviews: Schools learning from
test-score dips
- Family feedback: Regular input on school
climate
- Teacher suggestions: Front-line input on
policy improvements
Permitting & Inspections:
- Process mapping: Reducing delays through
workflow analysis
- Customer feedback: User satisfaction with
online services
- Technology upgrades: Incremental system
improvements
- Staff training: Continuous professional
development
Crisis Events:
- Major scandals or failures
- Budget crises and fiscal stress
- Technological disruptions
- Social movements and protests
Political Motivations:
- Electoral promises for change
- Ideological commitments
- Interest group pressures
- Media attention and criticism
Practical Motivations:
- Performance problems
- Citizen complaints
- Employee suggestions
- Benchmark comparisons
What’s Happening Now
Performance Budgeting:
- Tying budget allocations to outcome metrics
- Open-data performance dashboards
- Evidence-based program design
Permitting and Service Modernization:
- Online applications and same-day approvals
- Mobile inspection apps and electronic plan review
- Self-service portals for routine transactions
- AI-assisted eligibility and triage
Workforce and Inclusion Reform:
- Skills-based hiring and competency assessments
- Pay-equity and classification-modernization projects
- Hybrid work and flexible scheduling pilots
- Expanded apprenticeship and “earn-and-learn” pipelines
CJ students: most CJ agencies are running their own versions
of these reforms (body-cams, alternative response, pre-file
diversion). We'll dig into the CJ-specific versions in the
performance and accountability modules.
Delivery Frameworks
Sir Michael Barber’s
Principles
From Tony Blair’s UK reforms, now used
worldwide:
Clear Goals: Specific, measurable targets
Strong Leadership: Committed champions at top
Good Data: Regular measurement and feedback
Focused Delivery: Dedicated implementation teams
Political Support: Sustained commitment despite
changes
CJ students: CompStat (NYPD) is the canonical data-driven
policing example. It works because of the same five ingredients
below — clear goals, leadership, data, delivery team, and
sustained political support — and it has been adapted by many
other agencies since.
Other Delivery Examples:
- UK’s “Prime Minister’s Delivery Unit” tracking cross-government
priorities
- Federal PMA Scorecards (USDS-era performance reporting)
- State enterprise-zone programs with explicit job-creation
targets
Common Implementation
Problems
Organizational Resistance:
- Employees comfortable with current procedures
- Fear of job loss or reduced authority
- Lack of skills for new approaches
Political Obstacles:
- Change in leadership priorities
- Interest group opposition
- Media criticism of problems
Technical Challenges:
- Insufficient resources for implementation
- Technology failures or cost overruns
- Unintended consequences
Design Flaws:
- Unrealistic timelines or expectations
- Poor understanding of existing processes
- Inadequate planning and preparation
Lessons from Success
Stories
- Strong Leadership: Champions who persist through
obstacles
- Clear Vision: Specific goals everyone can
understand
- Stakeholder Buy-in: Including those affected in
design
- Adequate Resources: Funding and time for proper
implementation
- Measurement and Adjustment: Learning and adapting
during implementation
- Cultural Change: Addressing values and norms, not
just procedures
Example: Customer-service improvements at the
DMV required not just new systems but a culture shift in how
frontline staff think about their work
Current Trends:
- Artificial Intelligence: Automated eligibility
screening, chatbots for citizen services
- Data Analytics: Performance dashboards,
evidence-based decisions
- Mobile Technology: Field access to information
systems
- Social Media: Community engagement and
transparency
- Cloud Computing: Shared services and cost
reduction
Opportunities and Challenges:
- Efficiency vs. privacy concerns
- Innovation vs. digital divide
- Automation vs. human judgment
Emerging Approaches
Evidence-Based Reform:
- Using research to guide changes
- Pilot testing before full implementation
- Rigorous evaluation of results
Human-Centered Design:
- Starting with user needs and experiences
- Involving citizens in reform design
- Focus on service delivery, not just efficiency
Agile Government:
- Rapid experimentation and learning
- Quick adaptation to changing circumstances
- Continuous improvement cycles
Network Governance:
- Collaboration across organizational boundaries
- Public-private partnerships
- Community co-production of services
Skills You’ll Need
Analytical Skills:
- Understanding current processes and problems
- Using data to identify improvement opportunities
- Evaluating reform effectiveness
Political Skills:
- Building coalitions for change
- Managing stakeholder expectations
- Navigating organizational politics
Implementation Skills:
- Project management and change leadership
- Communication and training
- Problem-solving and adaptation
Ethical Foundation:
- Balancing efficiency with fairness
- Maintaining democratic accountability
- Serving the public interest
Case Study: Body-Worn
Cameras
Problem: Police accountability and community trust
Reform Type: Technology-enabled transparency and
performance improvement
Implementation Challenges:
- Technical: Camera reliability, data storage
costs
- Legal: Privacy policies, evidence procedures
- Organizational: Officer resistance, policy
development
- Political: Community expectations, budget
approval
Lessons: Successful reform requires addressing all
dimensions, not just buying technology
Discussion Questions
Thinking About Reform:
- Which type of reform (downsizing, reinventing, reengineering,
continuous improvement) appeals most to you? Why?
- How would you balance efficiency with equity in reform
efforts?
- What role should employees play in designing reforms that affect
their work?
- How can reformers maintain democratic accountability while
improving efficiency?
- What reforms do you think are most needed in criminal justice
today?
Module 5-2 Summary
Key Takeaways:
- Administrative reform is a continuous American tradition
- Different reform types often conflict with each other
- Reform movements respond to crises, politics, and practical
problems
- Technology is creating new opportunities and challenges
- Successful reform requires leadership, resources, and cultural
change
- Future reforms will emphasize evidence, user-centered design, and
networks
- You’ll be both implementing existing reforms and designing new
ones
Next: Examining human capital management and
personnel systems in detail