Public Administration and the Public Sector

What Makes a Good Public Administrator?

Core Competencies NASPAA Standards

1. Leadership & Management: Navigate complex political environments
   
2. Policy Participation: Help shape and implement public decisions
   
3. Critical Thinking: Analyze problems and develop solutions
   
4. Public Service Perspective: Serve the broader public interest
   
5. Communication: Work with diverse stakeholders and communities

Key Terms You Need to Know

Government: Formal institutions and processes for making collective decisions

• Example: City council, police department, federal courts

Public Administration: Managing and implementing public programs

• Example: Running a police department, managing court operations

Public Policy: Government decisions intended to affect citizens’ lives

• Example: Community policing policies, sentencing guidelines

Public Administration in Context

Governance: The broader process of governing beyond formal government

• Includes: NGOs, private contractors, community partnerships
• Example: Private prisons, community policing partnerships, court-appointed attorneys

The Big Picture: Modern governance involves many actors beyond traditional government

Three Enduring Debates in Public Administration

The Big Questions That Never Go Away

1. Politics vs. Administration
2. Facts vs. Values
3. Public vs. Private

These debates shape how we think about the role and practice of public administration

Debate 1: Politics vs. Administration

The Question: Should administrators be neutral implementers or active participants in policy?

Traditional View: “There is a science of administration which stands apart from politics.”

Reality Check:

• Police chiefs advocate for department budgets
• Court administrators influence judicial policy
• Federal agents make discretionary enforcement decisions

Your Take: Can public administrators really be “neutral”?

Debate 2: Facts vs. Values

The Question: Should administration be based on objective facts or subjective values?

The Challenge:

• Facts: Crime statistics, budget numbers, performance metrics
• Values: What kind of community do we want? How should we treat offenders?

Example: Using data to decide where to patrol vs. community values about policing priorities

Debate 3: Public vs. Private

The Question: Are public and private management fundamentally different?

Consider:

• Should government be run “like a business”?
• Can private companies deliver public services effectively?
• What about private prisons, private security, contracted court services?

Key Insight: The answer affects how we train, evaluate, and organize public servants

Public Administration is Interdisciplinary

Drawing from Many Fields

• Political Science: How power and authority work
• Economics: Resource allocation and efficiency
• Sociology: Group behavior and organizational culture
• Psychology: Individual motivation and decision-making
• Law: Legal frameworks and constitutional limits
• Management: Organizational theory and practice
• Public Policy: Policy analysis and evaluation
• History: Context and evolution of public institutions
• Ethics: Moral principles guiding public service
• Communication: Engaging with the public and stakeholders
• Information Technology: Data management and digital governance
• Environmental Science: Sustainability and resource management
• Urban Planning: City development and infrastructure
• Public Health: Health policy and community well-being
• Education: Educational policy and administration
• International Relations: Global governance and diplomacy
• Criminal Justice: Law enforcement, courts, corrections
• Social Work: Community services and support systems
• Anthropology: Cultural perspectives on governance
• Geography: Spatial analysis of public issues
• Statistics: Data analysis and interpretation
• Philosophy: Ethical frameworks and public morality
• Communication Studies: Public relations and media engagement
• Behavioral Science: Understanding human behavior in public contexts

Want to sail a ship? Make a bomb? Build a bridge? You need expertise from many fields

• Example: Building a bridge requires civil engineering, environmental science, urban planning, and public policy expertise
• Example: Creating a public health campaign requires knowledge of psychology, communication, sociology, and public policy
• Example: Managing a police department requires understanding law, sociology, psychology, and public administration principles
• Example: Running a city requires expertise in urban planning, public finance, environmental science, and community engagement
• Example: Implementing a new education policy requires insights from education theory, sociology, economics, and public administration
• Example: Addressing climate change requires collaboration across environmental science, public policy, economics, and community engagement
• Example: Responding to a public health crisis like COVID-19 requires expertise in epidemiology, public policy, communication, and crisis management

Why Interdisciplinary Matters

Public administration tackles complex problems that require multiple perspectives:

• Criminal justice reform: Needs law, psychology, sociology, economics
• Emergency management: Requires engineering, communications, political science
• Budget management: Uses economics, accounting, political science

Bottom Line: No single discipline has all the answers to public problems

Fundamental Questions

What We’re Really Asking

• Is managing in the public sector the same as managing in the private sector?
  • Think back to Module 1: Consider differences in goals, accountability, and constraints.
• What should government’s role be in society?
  • This fundamental question guides every decision in public administration.
• How can we ensure government acts in the public’s best interest?
  • This is the heart of the accountability challenge.

The Public’s Demands on Government

Three Core Expectations

1. Politics: Make choices among competing values
   • Example: Balancing public safety with individual rights
2. Performance: Get the work done effectively and efficiently
   • Example: Reducing crime rates, processing cases quickly
3. Accountability: Be answerable for actions and results
   • Example: Police oversight, judicial review, budget transparency

Understanding Accountability

Accountability = Being answerable for your actions

Five Key Principles

1. Transparency: Open processes and accessible information
   
2. Responsiveness: Reacting to public needs and concerns
   
3. Responsibility: Taking ownership of actions and outcomes
   
4. Integrity: Acting ethically and honestly
   
5. Trust: Building and maintaining public confidence

Types of Accountability

Political Accountability: Answerable to elected officials

• Example: Police chief reports to mayor

Legal Accountability: Answerable to courts and law

• Example: Following constitutional requirements

Administrative Accountability: Answerable within the organization

• Example: Internal affairs investigations

Social Accountability: Answerable to the public

• Example: Community oversight boards

Elements of Accountability

Fiscal: Responsible use of public money

• Example: Police overtime budgets, court operating costs

Process: Following proper procedures

• Example: Due process in investigations, transparent hiring

Program: Achieving intended outcomes

• Example: Crime reduction, case processing times

Performance: Meeting standards and goals

• Example: Response times, conviction rates

Accountability in Action

Police Example:

• Fiscal: Body camera costs vs. budget
• Process: Following arrest procedures
• Program: Community policing effectiveness
• Performance: Crime statistics and clearance rates

Question: How do these different types of accountability sometimes conflict?

Coming Up: Evolution of Public Administration

Five Major Approaches We’ll Explore

1. Old Public Administration (1880s-1960s): Efficiency and hierarchy
   
2. New Public Administration (1960s-1980s): Equity and social responsiveness
   
3. New Public Management (1980s-2000s): Market-based reforms
   
4. New Public Service (2000s): Citizen engagement and democracy
   
5. New Public Governance (2000s-present): Networks and collaboration

Each responds to different challenges and criticisms

Module 2-1 Summary

Key Takeaways:

• Public administration requires multiple competencies and perspectives
• Three enduring debates shape the field’s development
• Interdisciplinary approach essential for complex problems
• Accountability has multiple dimensions and stakeholders
• The field continues to evolve in response to changing challenges

Next: Historical development and theoretical approaches