Outputs
Outcomes
Muller v. Oregon (1908)
Empirical knowledge for gov't policy expanded as social science disciplines and law were professionalized in the early 20th century.
Increase in policy advisors in the 1930s and 1940s and especially after WWII.
Analytical Integrity Responsibility to Clients Adherence to One's Concept of Good
Objective Technician Let analysis speak for itself. Primary focus should be predicting consequences of alternative policies. |
Clients are necessary evils; their political fortunes should be secondary considerations. Keep distance from clients; select institutional clients whenever possible. | Relevant values should be identified but trade-offs among them should be left to clients. Objective advice promotes good in the long run. |
Client's Advocate Analysis rarely produces definitive conclusions. Take advantage of ambiguity to advise clients' positions. |
Clients provide analysts with legitimacy. Loyalty should be given in return for access to privileged information and to political processes. | Select clients with compatible value systems; use long-term relationships to change clients' conceptions of good. |
Issue Advocate Analysis rarely produces definitive conclusions. Emphasize ambiguity and excluded values when analysis does not support advocacy. |
Clients provide an opportunity for advocacy. Select them opportunistically; change clients to further personal policy agenda. | Analysis should be an instrument for progress towards ones' conception of the good society. |